Judicial Review
Members of Chambers have experience in advising on and appearing in judicial review matters, whether acting for the Petitioner or the Respondent. Members are happy to give advice on practical issues, such as whether proceedings can be avoided, and if not the prospects of success if litigation is embarked on.
The field of judicial review can encompass a wide range of matters. Cases in which members of Chambers have acted include the first case testing the powers of the Scottish Parliament (Whaley v Watson), a ground-breaking case on the implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights in relation to professional disciplinary procedures (Tehrani v UKCC), and issues arising out of prison conditions (Beggs v Scottish Ministers).
In addition, members have experience of advising on and appearing in statutory appeals in a number of areas, for example, appeals under the Regulation of Care (Scotland) Act 2001, the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997, and Solicitors (Scotland) Act 1980.
In this area, as with others, we are happy to accept instructions on a Direct Access basis via the Faculty of Advocates' Direct Access Rules. We aim to offer a service which is efficient, practical and cost effective.